Advertisement

Variability in the Phases of the Menstrual Cycle

      Objective

      To determine variability in the phases of the menstrual cycle among healthy, regularly cycling women.

      Design

      A prospective descriptive study of a new data set with biological markers to estimate parameters of the menstrual cycles.

      Participants

      One hundred forty one healthy women (mean age 29 years) who monitored 3 to 13 menstrual cycles with an electronic fertility monitor and produced 1,060 usable cycles of data.

      Measures and Outcomes

      Variability in the length of the menstrual cycle and of the follicular, fertile, and luteal phases, and menses. The estimated day of ovulation and end of the fertile phase was the peak fertility reading on the monitor (i.e., the urinary luteinizing hormone surge).

      Results

      Mean total length was 28.9 days (SD= 3.4) with 95% of the cycles between 22 and 36 days. Intracycle variability of greater than 7 days was observed in 42.5% of the women. Ninety‐five percent of the cycles had all 6 days of fertile phase between days 4 and 23, but only 25% of participants had all days of the fertile phase between days 10 and 17.

      Conclusions

      Among regularly cycling women, there is considerable normal variability in the phases of the menstrual cycle. The follicular phase contributes most to this variability. JOGNN, 35, 376‐384; 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552‐6909.2006.00051.x.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      AWHONN Member Login
      AWHONN Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Arévalo M.
        • Jennings V.
        • Sinai I.
        Efficacy of a new method of family planning: The standard days method.
        Contraception. 2002; 65: 333-338
        • Arévalo M.
        • Sinai I.
        • Jennings V.
        A fixed formula to define the fertile window of the menstrual cycle as the basis of a simple method of natural family planning.
        Contraception. 2000; 60: 357-360
        • Barron M.L.
        • Fehring R.J.
        Basal body temperature assessment: Is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy?.
        American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 2005; 30: 290-296
        • Barsom S.H.
        • Mansfield P.K.
        • Koch P.B.
        • Gierach G.
        • West S.G.
        Association between psychological stress and menstrual cycle characteristics in perimenopausal women.
        Women’s Health Issues. 2004; 14: 235-241
        • Behre H.M.
        • Kuhlage J.
        • Gassner C.
        • Sonntag B.
        • Schem C.
        • Schneider H.P.
        Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use Clearplan Fertility Monitor: Comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements.
        Human Reproduction. 2000; 15: 2478-2482
        • Brayer F.T.
        • Chiazze L.
        • Duffy B.J.
        Calendar rhythm and menstrual cycle range.
        Fertility and Sterility. 1969; 20: 279-288
        • Carr B.R.
        The normal menstrual cycle.
        in: Carr B.R. Blackwell R.E. Textbook of reproductive medicine. Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT1998
        • Chiazze L.
        • Brayer F.T.
        • Macisco J.J.
        • Parker M.P.
        • Duffy B.J.
        The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle.
        Journal of the American Medical Association. 1968; 203: 89-92
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Keverline S.
        • Meyn L.A.
        How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 289-292
        • Dunson D.
        • Baird D.D.
        • Wilcox A.J.
        • Weinberg C.R.
        Day‐specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation.
        Human Reproduction. 1999; 14: 1835-1839
        • Fehring R.
        Accuracy of the peak day of cervical mucus as a biological marker of fertility.
        Contraception. 2002; 66: 231-235
        • Fenster L.
        • Waller K.
        • Chen J.
        • Hubbard A.E.
        • Windham G.C.
        • Elkin E.
        Psychological stress in the workplace and menstrual function.
        American Journal of Epidemiology. 1999; 149: 127-134
        • France J.T.
        • Graham F.M.
        • Gosling L.
        • Hair P.
        • Knox B.S.
        Characteristics of natural conceptual cycles occurring in a prospective study of sex preselection: Fertility awareness symptoms, hormone levels, sperm survival, and pregnancy outcomes.
        International Journal of Fertility. 1992; 37: 244-255
        • Gnoth C.
        • Frank‐Hermann P.
        • Schmoll A.
        • Godehardt E.
        • Freundl G.
        Cycle characteristics after discontinuation of oral contraceptives.
        Gynecological Endocrinology. 2002; 16: 307-317
        • Hilgers T.W.
        Reproductive Anatomy & Physiology. Pope Paul VI Institute Press, Omaha, NE2002
        • Lamprecht V.M.
        • Grummer‐Strawn L.
        Development of new formulas to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle.
        Contraception. 1996; 54: 339-343
        • Lenton E.A.
        • Landgren B.M.
        • Sexton L.
        Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: Identification of the short luteal phase.
        British Journal of Obstretrics and Gynecology. 1984; 91: 685-689
        • MacGregor E.A.
        • Frith A.
        • Ellis J.
        • Aspinall L.
        Predicting menstrual migraine with a home‐use fertility monitor.
        Neurology. 2005; 64: 561-563
        • Mosher W.D.
        • Martinez G.M.
        • Chandra A.
        • Abma J.
        • Willson S.J.
        Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982‐2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD2004
        • Munster K.
        • Schmidt L.
        • Helm P.
        Length and variation in the menstrual cycle—A cross‐sectional study from a Danish county.
        British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992; 99: 422-429
        • Olds S.B.
        • London M.L.
        • Ladewig P.W.
        • Davidson M.R.
        Maternal‐Newborn Nursing & Women’s Health Care. Pearson: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ2004
        • Ostrzenski A.
        Gynecology, Integration Conventional, Complementary, and Natural Alternative Therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2002
        • Palter S.
        • Olive D.
        Reproductive physiology.
        in: Berek S.J. Novak’s Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Phildelphia2002: 149-172
        • Rowland A.S.
        • Baird D.D.
        • Long S.
        • Wegeinka G.
        • Harlow S.D.
        • Alavanja M.
        Influence of medical of medical conditions and lifestyle factors on the menstrual cycle.
        Epidemiology. 2002; 13: 668-674
        • Sinai I.
        • Jennings V.
        • Arévalo M.
        The importance of screening and monitoring: The standard days method and cycle regularity.
        Contraception. 2004; 69: 201-206
        • Solomon C.G.
        • Hu F.B.
        • Dunaif A.
        • Rich‐Edwards J.E.
        • Stampfer M.J.
        • Willett W.C.
        Menstrual cycle irregularity and risk for future cardiovascular disease.
        Journal of clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2002; 87: 2013-2017
        • Solomon C.G.
        • Hu F.B.
        • Dunaif A.
        • Rich‐Edwards J.
        • Willet W.C.
        • Hunter D.J.
        Long or highly irregular menstrual cycles as a marker for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
        Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001; 286: 2421-2426
        • Speroff L.
        • Fritz M.A.
        Clinical Gynecology Endocrinology and Infertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2005
        • Stanford J.B.
        • White G.L.
        • Hatasaka H.
        Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: Current evidence.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002; 100: 1333-1341
        • Treloar A.E.
        • Boynton R.
        • Behn B.
        • Brown B.
        Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life.
        International Journal of Fertility. 1967; 12: 77-126
        • Unipath Diagnostics
        Professional information: Clear plan easy fertility monitor. Unipath Diagnostics Company, Princeton, NJ2001
        • Vollman R.
        The Menstrual Cycle. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia1977
        • Wilcox A.J.
        • Dunson D.
        • Baird D.D.
        The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: Day specific estimates from a prospective study.
        British medical Journal. 2000; 321: 1259-1262
        • Wilcox A.J.
        • Weinberg C.R.
        • Baird D.D.
        Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 1995; 333: 1517-1521
        • World Health Organization Task Force
        A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. III. Characteristics of the menstrual cycle and of the fertile phase.
        Fertility and Sterility. 1983; 40: 773-778
        • Zdanuk J.L.
        Assessment of women.
        in: Lowerdermilk D.E. Perry S.E. Bobak I.M. Maternity & Women’s Health Care, 88‐114. Mosby, St. Louis, MO2000
        • Zinaman M.
        • Stevenson W.
        Efficacy of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in lactating women after the return of menses.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991; 165: 2037-2039
        • Kambic R.T.
        • Lamprecht V.
        Calendar rhythm efficacy: a review.
        Advances in Contraception. 1996; 12: 123-128